Legal Opinion

Caudle v. Metropolitan Police Department

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 30, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-0205Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) FRAZIER CAUDLE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-00205 (HHK/AK) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM ORDER Pending before this Court is the District of Columbia’s Motion to Stay Ruling on the Sanctions and Cost Arguments Set Forth in Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Enforce the Court’s Order Requiring Production of Discovery Responsive to the Court’s Ruling on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions (“Motion”) [172];…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. David Dellinger v. John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Ellsberg v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  4. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API