Legal Opinion

Chernock v. Celebrezze

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 36353PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, filed this action alleging jurisdiction under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S. C.A. § 405(g), to seek judicial review of a hearing examiner’s order setting plaintiff’s fee for representation of a claimant before the hearing examiner. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

u

The facts leading up to the present action are not substantially disputed and may be summarized as follows:

A Rorothy Lott filed claims for benefits under Title II of the Social…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare v. Joseph HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Hines v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Sheppard v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1960
  4. Goodell v. FlemmingDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Britton v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1967
  2. Watson v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API