In re the Claim of Stanford

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 13, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant admitted that he had previously been warned that he was taking too long to make deliveries. There was also testimony that claimant had received a written warning concerning the length of his deliveries and that he was warned that he could be discharged if it continued. On the last day of his employment, claimant took an hour for a delivery that…