David Neil Spaulding v. Thomas W. Nielsen, Chief U.S. Probation Officer, and Henry Lucas, Jr., Deputy U.S. Probation Officer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This case presents the question whether a federal probation officer is immune from a suit for damages based on alleged misconduct in the investigation and preparation of a presentence report. Appellant Spaulding, the plaintiff below, brought a civil action seeking damages, as well as equitable and declaratory relief. He claimed that defendants Nielsen and Lucas were responsible for an incomplete and incorrect presentence report, 1 which denied him due process of law. The court below dismissed the action for failure to state a claim, holding that defendants were quasi-judicial officers and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Norman Burkes, Jr. v. Luther Callion, Deputy Central Adult Investigations, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Snell v. TunnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Frank S. Dorman v. Michael HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.