Legal Opinion
Realco Services, Inc. v. Holt
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 5, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-4097PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
The Court has twelve motions currently before it for decision in this case. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) states that no attorney shall “present to the Court vexatious motions ... or shall otherwise so multiply the proceedings in a case as to increase unreasonably and vexatiously the costs thereof.” After review of each of the twelve motions outstanding, the Court does not believe that any can be called “vexatious”. On the other hand, many are not substantial enough to require discussion and will be dealt with in the accompanying Order.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Robinson v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Realco Services, Inc. v. HoltDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Denenberg v. Am. Family Corp. of Columbus, Ga.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bunch v. Artec International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- United States v. Philadelphia Health Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Badger Cab Co. v. SouleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.