Legal Opinion

A. L. Greenberg Iron Co. v. Wood

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after staling the facts). Sec. 1994 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest provides that whenever the county court may deem it expedient to call in the outstanding warrants of Ms county, in order to redeem, cancel, reissue or classify them, or for any lawful purpose whatever, it shall be the duty of said court to make an order for that purpose, fixing the time for presentation, etc.

Section 1995 provides for the giving of notice in such cases. It is conceded that the statute was complied with in maMng the order and giving the notice. The sole ground of reversal is that road warrants do not come…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Izard County v. Vincennes Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Gould v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. Bank of Augusta & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. U. S. Sanitary Specialty Corp. v. Pike CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API