Legal Opinion
In Re Rhead
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 24, 1999No. Bankruptcy BR-93-10596-PHX-CGCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER ON REMAND RE: DEBTORS’ APPLICATION TO CLOSE CASE
CHARLES G. CASE, II, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter arises from a remand order of the United States District Court from an appeal by the United States Trustee (“UST”) of this Court’s August 5, 1996. Order closing Debtors Jim and Karin Rhead’s (“Debtors”) bankruptcy and holding that Debtors were not required to pay the UST post-confirmation quarterly fees from January 27, 1996, until the close of the case. The issue on appeal was whether this Court erred in holding that Debtors were not required to pay to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Trustee v. Gryphon at the Stone Mansion, Inc., D/B/A Erik Lewis Global D/B/A Wanner Van HeldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- In Re Michael J. Kissinger, Debtor. Thomas Mataya, Creditor-Appellee v. Michael J. Kissinger, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re McLean Square Associates, G.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schwartz v. Aquatic Dev. Group, Inc. (In re Aquatic Dev. Group, Inc.) - concurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States Trustee v. Kroy (Europe) Ltd. (In Re Kroy (Europe) Ltd.)District Court, D. Arizona · 2000
- Schwartz v. Aquatic Dev. Group, Inc. (In re Aquatic Dev. Group, Inc.) - concurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003