Smith v. Sipe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentMahoney, P. J.
In my view, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for breach of the duty of fair representation and should, therefore, be dismissed.
The duty of a labor organization to fairly represent its members, which was created by Federal case law, is violated where a union’s conduct toward a member is arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith (see, Vaca v Sipes, 386 US 171,190; see also, Hines v Anchor Motor Frgt., 424 US 554, 568-569). A showing that a labor organization handled a member’s grievance in a perfunctory manner is also sufficient to establish a breach of the duty of fair…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Civil Service Bar Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jackson v. Regional Transit ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.