Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Sipe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 1985Published

1DissentMahoney, P. J.

In my view, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for breach of the duty of fair representation and should, therefore, be dismissed.

The duty of a labor organization to fairly represent its members, which was created by Federal case law, is violated where a union’s conduct toward a member is arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith (see, Vaca v Sipes, 386 US 171,190; see also, Hines v Anchor Motor Frgt., 424 US 554, 568-569). A showing that a labor organization handled a member’s grievance in a perfunctory manner is also sufficient to establish a breach of the duty of fair…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Civil Service Bar Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Jackson v. Regional Transit ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API