Legal Opinion

Crapps v. Spivey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 18, 1978No. 20693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

The appellants Crapps (Vendors) brought this action to recover the balance due on the sale of grocery stock and equipment to M. V. Norris (Vendee). The respondent (Spivey), a wholesale grocer, was joined as a party defendant because of an alleged promise that he would stand behind Norris’ obligation to pay. Spivey, in his answer, denied that he made any statement, promise or guarantee to answer for the Vendee’s debt. He further alleged that the Vendors’ claim was not in writing and was barred by the Statute of Frauds, § 32-3-10, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976). At…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lorick & Lowrance v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Brown v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Price v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. DeWitt v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Electric Co. v. Lions GateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API