Legal Opinion
Khaolaead v. Leisure Video
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 2005PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*821In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Leisure Video appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated October 9, 2003, which conditionally granted the plaintiffs’ motion to “restore” the action to active pre-note of issue status and, in effect, to vacate the alleged “disposed” marking in the court computer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
This action, stemming from an incident in December 1990, allegedly was marked “disposed” by the court computer at a time when no note of issue had been filed.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Johnson v. Brooklyn Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hemberger v. Jamaica HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bar-El v. Key Food Stores Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by17 opinions
- Andre v. Bonetto Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- New York State Division of Human Rights v. Oceanside Cove II Apartment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Kapnisakis v. WooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- M & W Registry, Inc. v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Moore v. AckermanNew York Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.