Tate v. Derifield
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREASEN, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her action for damages for loss of spousal consortium. The district court dismissed plaintiffs action ruling that loss of consortium was a derivative claim and could not be brought absent an action by the injured spouse. For reasons stated in this opinion, we affirm.
I. Background.
Denise Tate (Tate) filed a petition seeking damages for loss of consortium resulting from her husband’s incarceration. The petition named Roxanne Derifield and the TriCounty Drug Task Force (Task Force) as defendants. The Task Force is an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berger v. General United Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Leuchtenmacher v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Cole v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Troester v. Sisters of Mercy Health Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Fitzpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rieff v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Ritz v. Wapello County Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Rimert v. MortellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mlynarik v. BergantzelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Gerald P. Young, Michael L. Haigh, and Suzanne M. Runyon, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Healthport Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.