Legal Opinion

People v. Somers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The issues sought to be raised by defendant are not preserved for this Court’s review and, therefore, the Court cannot consider the merits.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Bellacos a. Judge Hancock, Jr., dissents and votes to reverse, concluding that defendant preserved the constitutional issue whether the application of Penal Law §§ 40.15 and 25.00 unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof to defendant, and that the trial court’s charge to the jury failed to safeguard against the insanity affirmative defense…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. KohlNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. MarlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. People v. RobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. GastonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API