Legal Opinion

Piccolo v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McCarthy, J.

Petitioners were members of Piccolo Properties, LLC, which was certified pursuant to General Municipal Law article 18-B as a Qualified Empire Zone Enterprise (hereinafter QEZE). The *109corporation owned five parcels of property in the Auburn Empire Zone. The Auburn Empire Zone is located within the Downtown Auburn Business Improvement District, which levies a charge — known as the downtown improvement tax — on all properties in the district to pay for things such as beautification projects, cultural events, business promotion, safety programs and accessibility…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People Ex Rel. Westchester Fire Insurance v. DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. In re the Claim of GruberNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API