Legal Opinion
Rury v. Gandy
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided April 22, 1926No. 4314PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues defendants for damages because of malicious prosecution resulting in plaintiff’s imprisonment. There is no diversity of citizenship. The plaintiff alleges his adjudication as a bankrupt in this court; that defendants were, in that proceeding, the trustee, the trustee’s attorney, and attorney for one of the creditors. It is alleged that the defendants, in pursuance of a conspiracy on their part, by false accusations made to the United States attorney concerning plaintiff, and at defendants’ request secured the submission of an accusation against plaintiff…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Voors v. National Women's Health Organization, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
- Nationwide Charters & Conventions, Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966
- Thompson v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1931
- (PC) Antonio Perez v. PhiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.