Legal Opinion

Gray v. Gunby

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1949No. 16800PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

The petition in this case clearly shows that the plaintiff in error seeks to review what he claims to be an error in the judgment of the ordinary, dated May 18, 1949. Express provision is made in the Code, §§ 6-201 and 19-201, for the right of appeal and the right of certiorari from decisions and judgments rendered by the ordinary. The Code, § 64-101, provides that mandamus is available only “if there shall be no other specific legal remedy.” This court has many times held that mandamus will not lie if there exists another legal remedy. Since, in this case, there was another…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harper v. BurgessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Wofford v. PorteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. McGarvey v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. O'Callahan v. AikensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  5. Wofford v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API