In re S.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.
Appellant S.M. appeals from the trial court’s order transferring him from the custody of the Texas Youth Commission (TYC) to the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (IDTDCJ). In two points, Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in admitting TYC records, as well as a report and testimony generated from those records, because the admission of these records violated his right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On December 21, 2001, Appellant1 entered a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Russeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ex Parte CarmonaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- In re D.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re of F.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- In re M.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- In Re SMCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Hesiquio Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- In Re FD, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.