Legal Opinion

Kupferman v. Batchelor

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 27, 1914Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Action by Samuel Kupferman against Rosanna Batchelor and another. From a City Court order denying defendants’ application for a further bill of particulars, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.

The order for a bill of particulars was made on the 16th day of June, 1914. Prior thereto an order by another justice of the court, in which it was held that the defendant was entitled to have the name of the employer of the plaintiff. The court followed the case of Quinn v. Fitzgerald, 87 App. Div. 539, 84 N. Y. Supp. 728. On the motion made to enforce full compliance with "the first order, the court ruled, upon the authority of Greene v. Johnson, 126 App. Div. 33, 110 N. Y. Supp. 104, that the defendant was not entitled to the name of the employer. This was in effect to overrule the prior…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greene v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Quinn v. FitzGeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Quinn v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API