Seely v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Wise County; F. O. McKinsey, Judge. Frank Seely was convicted of abandonment after seduction and marriage, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, J.
The conviction is for abandonment after seduction and marriage, as defined in article 1450, P. C.
A motion to quash the indictment was filed and overruled. It assailed the indictment upon the ground that it failed to designate the court in which, prior to the marriage, the prosecution was begun. The essential elements of the offense are a seduction, a marriage, and an abandonment. The marriage must take place after prosecution has begun in a court of competent jurisdiction. This court, in the case of Kirkendall v. State, 78 Tex. Cr. R. 168, 180 S. W. 676, passing upon the requisites of an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rudy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Kirkendall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926