Legal Opinion

Reznick v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 2005No. CIV. 03-40132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GADOLA, District Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

On February 3-6, 2004, the Court conducted a bench trial in this case. The parties each submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in March 2004. The Court now issues its findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These findings of fact and conclusions of law represent the Court’s consideration of all of the evidence in light of the pertinent law, the Court’s observation of the witnesses, and its evaluation of their demeanor, qualifications, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. George S. Talley v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Homeside Lending, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Morinelli v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Nabozny v. BurkhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. MacK v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  3. Allen v. First UNUM Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  4. CODA Development s.r.o. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API