Legal Opinion

Moulton v. Beals

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 29, 1954No. 4291PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

R. L., c. 57, s. 3, as amended, provides that selectmen “shall warn” a. special meeting upon application of a specified number of voters, and section 8 provides that a Justice of the Superior Court upon application of the voters, may issue a warrant for such meeting “if the selectmen unreasonably neglect or refuse to warn.” By the decree and order providing for the special meeting, the Presiding Justice impliedly found that the refusal of the selectmen to call the meeting was unreasonable. The defendants’ exceptions to the decree and order raise the question of whether the Court was warranted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. PlunkettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Town of Union v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Public Works v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Rossi v. Town of PelhamDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Woodside v. Selectmen of DerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Moulton v. BealsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
  5. Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API