Legal Opinion

State v. Van Erem

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1923No. File No. 5224Published

1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.

Information charging the defendant with the

unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors to one Ole P. Brunstuen, at Summit, this state. It appears that the defendant came to the Brunstuen store to do some trading. Brunstuen asked Van Erem if he could find some liquor, to cure a cold. Defendant replied he had none, and1 did not know just where there was any. Then Brunstuen asked him- if he did not think he could find somebody that had liquor; that he was sick and needed it. Defendant said he would look around and see if he could find anybody that had some, and, if he located any he was to leave it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Commonwealth v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Lockhart v. City of Clear LakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bragg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API