Legal Opinion

Selectmen of West Springfield v. Hoar

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

These two bills for declaratory decrees, both brought in the Superior Court by the selectmen of West Springfield as “the appropriate public authority” referred to in G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 32, § 89A, inserted by St. 1948, c. 552, and now most recently amended by St. 1952, c. 431, § 4, present the question whether the presumption defined in G. L. (Ter. Ed.) e. 32, § 94, added by St. 1950, c. 551, and as now appearing in St. 1951, c. 594, applies in instances where an annuity is claimed under § 89A by the *258widow of a police officer who died of heart disease. Each defendant is the widow of such a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Director of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Acford v. Auditor of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathewson v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. McLean v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Downey v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API