Kerr v. Dildine
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying motion to dissolve an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
The plaintiffs were judgment creditors of the defendant, Edward P. Karr, and levied an execution upon a stock of goods, which were covered by a chattel mortgage made by Karr to the defendant Dildine. This action is brought in aid of the execution, and the injunction in question was granted to restrain the defendant Dildine from selling the property. His motion to dissolve the injunction was denied, and he appeals. To justify the granting of an injunction order it must appear by the complaint that the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment restraining the commission or continuance of an act the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southard v. . BennerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Brackett v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Conkling v. . ShelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Estes v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Towne v. JaquithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809