Legal Opinion

Havens v. Trawick

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1990No. 89-130PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Lamar and Ann Havens,1 appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, Bill Trawick, Hamp Griffin Volvo-Subaru, and others. The Havenses alleged fraud and breach of contract. Because we find that the trial court improperly entered a summary judgment for the defendants, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Facts

The Havenses claim that they were defrauded by the defendants because, they say, the defendants failed to live up to an offer made in a sales advertisement. This advertisement consisted of a flier announcing a special sale of new Volvo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. P & S BUSINESS v. South Cent. Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Reeves v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Bogle v. ScheerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ex Parte Bagby Elevator & Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Richardson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rice v. Birmingham Coal & Coke Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Hood v. Bennitt (In Re Bennitt)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006
  3. Barber v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Dothard v. Dept. of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Harsco Corp. v. NAVISTAR INTERN. TRANSP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API