State v. Suggs
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel P. Conviser, J.
This decision addresses what the court believes is an issue of first impression under New York State’s Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act (SOMTA) (Mental Hygiene Law art 10): May the State, during an article 10 trial, compel the respondent to testify as a witness for the State? This court concludes that the answer is no.
Statement of Facts
The respondent, John Suggs, pleaded guilty in 1968 to rape in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, in satisfaction of a number of rape, sodomy, robbery, assault and other charges arising from…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.