Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentDoyle, Judge
I respectfully dissent. In reversing the decision of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board), I believe that the majority inappropriately faded to recognize well-settled principles of federal labor law in interpreting Act 111,1 and I would affirm the decision of the Board.
As the majority points out, in Philadelphia Fire Officers Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 470 Pa. 550, 369 A.2d 259 (1977), our Supreme Court determined that Act 111 and the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act2 (PLRA) are to be interpreted in pari materia. Specifically, the Court stated:
We are of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Philadelphia Fire Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Chirico v. BD. OF SUP'RS FOR NEWTON TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Singleton Packing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Altoona Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.