Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 1996No. 95-01072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

We affirm Cedric Brown’s conviction for possession of cocaine, but strike a portion of a probation condition and prosecution costs.

With respect to probation conditions, conditions 4 (weapons), 7 (intoxicants), and 8 (employment) need not be orally pronounced because the order of probation form in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.986 *396provides notice of these conditions. See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996). Condition (A) of Brown’s probation, which was not orally pronounced, requires him to pay for alcohol/drug testing. While submitting to alcohol and drug screening…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Reiter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pearson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API