Stahnka v. Kreitle
Nebraska Supreme Court
ERROR from the district court for Dixon, county. Action for statutory damages under liquor license. Tried below before Graves, J. Verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $500. Judgment on verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
Ames, 0.
There are in this case a large number of assignments and cross-assignments of error in petitions for the reversal of a judgment of the district court. One of the objections to the judgment which is presented in various ways and phases, is to the effect following. It is alleged in the petition and not denied as follows:
‘*1. That from the first day of May, 1896, to the first *830day of May, 1900, the said defendants Detlof Kay and William Kay were engaged in the business of the retail traffic of intoxicating liquors in the village of Wakefield, in the county of Dixon and state of Nebraska, as…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Sturgis, Cornish & Burn Co. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Acken v. TinglehoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Jessen v. WillhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Bulger v. PrenicaNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Selders v. BrothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.