Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Watson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 5, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff in this case was a passenger for hire in a taxicab owned by the defendant, Harold Watson, and operated by the defendant Carl Watson, his agent. The finding of facts is not attacked upon this appeal. On November 24th, 1933, at about two o’clock in the morning, the taxicab in which the plaintiff was riding as a passenger collided with the rear end of a truck owned by the defendant William L. Fitzgerald and operated by his agent Joseph Doherty. The truck was standing on the Hartford-Willimantic highway in the town of Bolton headed in an easterly direction. At that point, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Stroud v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Nathan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Cuneo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Jackson v. W. A. Norris, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Jackson v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.