Legal Opinion

Farr v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1904No. Calendar No. 20,142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari to Osceola; McAlvay, J. Mandamus by Alta Farr to compel Thomas Anderson: and others, president and trustees of the village of Tustin, to approve a liquor bond. From an order granting the writ, respondents bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

The conceded facts in this cause are substantially as follows: Alta Farr, the relator, is the wife of R. B. Farr, and is a resident of the village of Tustin. Upon-the 4th day of May last she filed a liquor bond, regular in form, with her husband, R. B. Farr, and one O. P. Engstrom, as sureties, who qualified as required by statute. The sureties are freeholders and residents of the village of Tustin. Respondents composed the village council of the village of Tustin. They held a meeting on the 4th day of May, when the said bond was taken up for consideration, but not approved. The council held…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Divine v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Price v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API