Legal Opinion

Wright v. Hooker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Hacogdoches County. Tried below before Hon. C. D. Mims.

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Chief Justice.

At a former day of this term we affirmed the judgment of the court below without a written opinion. Appellants have filed a motion requesting that we prepare and file a written statement of our conclusions of fact and law upon the questions presented by the record. While the statute does not require the Courts of Civil Appeals to render written opinions in affirmed cases which can not be taken to the Supreme Court by writ of error, in deference to request of counsel we will briefly state the nature of the case and the reasons which controlled us in concluding that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fire Ass'n v. La Grange & Lockhart Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fant v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Ives v. CultonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. General Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Beckville Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Fant v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API