Legal Opinion

Oliver v. French

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, Columbia county. Action by Effie B. Oliver against Margaret R. French and others. From an order denying a motion to modify the judgment and decree entered in the action, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.

This action was tried by a judge, who made and filed his conclusions of fact and law, none of which were excepted to on the trial. Upon such findings, the judge, after hearing the attorneys for the respective parties as to the form and substance of the decree to be entered in the action, made, signed, and filed the same, and judgment was duly entered thereon. Afterwards, on an order to show cause granted by the trial judge, a motion was made by the plaintiff to modify the decree upon the ground that the same did not conform to the findings of fact and law found by such trial justice, and the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Lewis v. GrahamNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Baxter & Fuller v. Arnold, Conklin & BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Roche v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brenker v. DlattCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909
  2. Union Bag & Paper Co. v. Allen Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API