Legal Opinion

Royer v. Carey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LB BLANC, Judge.

One of the grounds on which the application for rehearing is based is that the court unintentionally overlooked passing on the question of whether or not a penalty was due, when the defendant had admitted that they made a lump sum settlement of the plaintiff’s claim without the approval of the court.

Whilst it is a fact that the plaintiff did attempt to make that an issue in the case by filing a supplemental petition, which defendant answered by denying the allegations it contained, the evidence shows merely that the payment of $19.50 was made as compensation that was due…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Royer v. CareyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API