Legal Opinion

El v. Beard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2003No. 53A05-0212-JV-608PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Antwaan Randle El ("Father") and Tas-hia L. Beard ("Mother") appeal the trial court's judgment on Father's petition to establish paternity of C.LR.E. ("C.") and determine support. Mother raises the dis-positive question on cross-appeal: whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over Mother to determine child support under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ("UIFSA"). Finding the trial court did not have jurisdiction, we need not address Father's issues on appeal. 1

Reversed.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mother and Father dated but did not marry. In July or August…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anthem Ins. Companies v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sims v. BeamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fulk v. Allied Signal, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. Omega Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Munster v. GroceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Auclair v. BoldersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. The Money Store Investment Corp. v. SummersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Hancock v. Marion County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Joseph Esparza v. Koren Lopez (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API