Legal Opinion
Commercial Bank v. Foltz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 6, 1898Published
Action by the Commercial Bank against Moses Foltz and Beaman Catto, impleaded, etc.
1Opinion of the Court
No opinion. Order of July 2d, denying motion to correct an order granted June 11, 1896, and order denying motion to strike out Catto’s amended answer, and denying motion to vacate another order granted June 11, 1896, which vacated an order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the amended answer of Catto, affirmed, without costs to either party. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 183.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commercial Bank v. FoltzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896