Legal Opinion

United States v. David P. Talley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1994No. 93-3058PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

David P. Talley appeals his conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1988) and the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (1988). Talley argues that the district court should have dismissed the § 922(g) charge against him because the federal prosecution violated the double jeopardy clause and the district court improperly applied § 924(e) to enhance his sentence. We hold that Talley’s conviction under § 922(g) did not violate the double jeopardy clause, but we also hold that the district court improperly interpreted and applied § 924(e). We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States v. Lavandris JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Tom Vig, United States of America v. Donovan VigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  4. United States v. S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Daniel Basile, United States of America v. Richard DecaroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API