United States v. David P. Talley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
David P. Talley appeals his conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1988) and the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (1988). Talley argues that the district court should have dismissed the § 922(g) charge against him because the federal prosecution violated the double jeopardy clause and the district court improperly applied § 924(e) to enhance his sentence. We hold that Talley’s conviction under § 922(g) did not violate the double jeopardy clause, but we also hold that the district court improperly interpreted and applied § 924(e). We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- United States v. Lavandris JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Tom Vig, United States of America v. Donovan VigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- United States v. S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Daniel Basile, United States of America v. Richard DecaroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.