Legal Opinion

220 Partnership v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1989No. 475 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

The present case comes before us on direct appeal from a final order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, issued on April 28, 1988, which found the 220 Partnership and its general partner Philip J. Banks, Appellants, to be in civil contempt for failure to comply with previous court orders, and imposed a $10,000 fine. Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this matter, we quash the appeal and remand to the trial court for the calculation and award of costs and attorneys’ fees to Appellee, the City of Philadelphia (City).

This case has a lengthy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re KemmererCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Szura v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Hanna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Center Township v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Kennedy & Carter Construction Co. v. BarkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. FrempongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Eachus v. Chester County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Colville v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Donohue v. Arrowhead Lake Community Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. City of Philadelphia v. FrempongCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API