Legal Opinion

Sausalito Pharmacy, Inc. v. Blue Shield of California, Travelers Insurance Co., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1982No. 81-4198PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In the district court, summary judgment went against Sausalito and other pharmacies complaining of prepaid prescription plans of health care insurers and administrators. The defendants had entered into contractual arrangements with participating pharmacies under which each participating pharmacy would provide prescription drugs at stipulated prices, which were alleged to be generally less than current charges of the pharmacies to uninsured customers. The claim was that such plans violated § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 1, and the corresponding provision of the California Cartwright…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Medical Arts Pharmacy of Stamford, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Medical Arts Pharmacy of Stamford, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1981

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. American Key Corporation, and Ron Deweese v. Cole National Corporation, and Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Dr. Donald J. Barry and Dr. Bert Hassler v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Royal Drug Company, Inc., Etc. v. Group Life and Health Insurance Co., Etc., Group Life and Health Insurance Co., Etc. v. Royal Drug Company, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Dr. James R. Brillhart v. Mutual Medical Insurance, Inc., D/B/A Blue Shield of Indiana, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API