Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Greer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1999No. S-97-596Published

1ConcurrenceWright, J.

I concur in the result. I write separately, however, to address the problems with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-507(1) (Reissue 1995), which provides that a person commits burglary if such person willfully, maliciously, and forcibly breaks and enters any real estate or any improvement erected thereon with intent to commit any felony or with intent to steal property of any value. As written, breaking is an essential element of burglary, and in my opinion, it should not be an essential element.

For more than a century, we have tried to define “breaking” in terms of requiring the removal of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McDowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. TyrrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. ZemunskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hayward v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. McGrath v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API