Legal Opinion

State v. Searcy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1978No. 7829SC136Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Both defendants argue that their motions for nonsuit should have been allowed. Defendant Teague argues that he was a mere passenger in the Mustang; that there was no evidence of how he entered the Mustang or of his relationship to the driver or the owner; and that there was no evidence that he had control over either the vehicle or the gun. We agree with defendant Teague that there was no evidence that he was acting in concert or that he was particeps criminis. In the case of State v. Ledford, 24 N.C. App. 542, 211 S.E. 2d 532 (1975), the fact that contraband was found under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GlazeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API