Aiken v. Hale & McDonald
Texas Commission of Appeals
Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. John C. Easton. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtWalkeb, P. J.
This was a suit brought by the appellees against the appellant, for damages for the breach of a verbal contract respecting land; by a subsequent amendment of the original petition, the plaintiffs prayed for a specific enforcement of the contract, whereby one-third of the land should be decreed to them under the contract, and also alternatively praying for their damages, if they were not entitled to a specific performance of the contract.
The contract between the parties above referred to, as described and set forth in the plaintiffs’ petition, was in effect as follows: W. B. Aiken stated to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Ann Berta Lodge, No. 42 v. LevertonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Patton v. RuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Garner v. StubblefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Watts v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lassiter v. BoucheCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928