Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Hale & McDonald

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1880No. Case Ne. 2931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. John C. Easton. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtWalkeb, P. J.

This was a suit brought by the appellees against the appellant, for damages for the breach of a verbal contract respecting land; by a subsequent amendment of the original petition, the plaintiffs prayed for a specific enforcement of the contract, whereby one-third of the land should be decreed to them under the contract, and also alternatively praying for their damages, if they were not entitled to a specific performance of the contract.

The contract between the parties above referred to, as described and set forth in the plaintiffs’ petition, was in effect as follows: W. B. Aiken stated to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Ann Berta Lodge, No. 42 v. LevertonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Patton v. RuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Garner v. StubblefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Watts v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1849

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lassiter v. BoucheCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API