Legal Opinion

United States v. Achabal

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 5, 1940No. 51PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judge.

This is one of thirty-nine actions instituted at or about the same time, November *220, 1939, and presenting the same questions of law, thirty-two of which are still pending and seven of which have been dismissed. The pending actions were submitted in conjunction with the instant case.

The questions of law presented, upon a motion to dismiss, are in respect to the validity of certain rules or regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under the provisions of the Act of Congress approved June 28, 1934, known as the “Taylor Grazing Act,” 43 U.S.C.A. §§ 315-315p, 48…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. DewarNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Fallini v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1989
  3. Ratermann v. RatermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. John L. Faulkner, Laura Jo Faulkner, R. Fred Faulkner, and Susan L. Faulkner v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. EDWARD REYNOLDS v. PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API