Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Watkins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1928No. 27185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPack, J.

L. L. Patterson and his wife purchased a Cadillac car from a Jackson dealer, executing notes for deferred payments thereon, secured by a deed of trust on the car, designating H. V. Watkins as trustee. The deed of trust was promptly recorded, and subsequently, together with the notes, assigned to a Jackson bank. Appellant, Hardy, operates a place of business in which he sells automobile tires and auto accessories. In connection therewith, he is engaged in vulcanizing and in the repair of tires. Hardy sued the Pattersons on account, four items of which weré for the price of new casings and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. J. A. Broom & Son v. S. S. Dale & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hollis & Ray v. IsbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Moorhead Motor Co. v. H. D. Walker Auto Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Orr v. Jackson Jitney Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. City of Adrian v. Whitney Central National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hannan Motor Co. v. DARRMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wingate v. Mississippi Securities Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Eastex Finance Co. v. BryantMississippi Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API