Legal Opinion

Kliesing v. Neuhaus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1954No. 12661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

The appellee concedes that this statement of the nature and result of the trial of this cause below is an adequáté one:

“This action was instituted in the court .below by appellee against, appellant and Ray M. Hay and R. S. Johnson, in which action appellee,sought to. recover upon a promissory note executed by appellant and Ray M. Hay and R. S. Johnson and payable to ap-.pellee. Appellee sought to recover interest and attorney’s fees as.provided in said note. Appellant answered by general denial and. filed a cross-claim against defendants Hay and Johnson and impleáded Regent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Beitel v. BeitelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. O'Brien v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Felker v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bill Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Rice v. Travelers Express Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Ruthart v. First State Bank, Tulia, TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API