Legal Opinion
Kliesing v. Neuhaus
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 11, 1954No. 12661PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
The appellee concedes that this statement of the nature and result of the trial of this cause below is an adequáté one:
“This action was instituted in the court .below by appellee against, appellant and Ray M. Hay and R. S. Johnson, in which action appellee,sought to. recover upon a promissory note executed by appellant and Ray M. Hay and R. S. Johnson and payable to ap-.pellee. Appellee sought to recover interest and attorney’s fees as.provided in said note. Appellant answered by general denial and. filed a cross-claim against defendants Hay and Johnson and impleáded Regent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGee v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Beitel v. BeitelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- O'Brien v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Felker v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bill Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Rice v. Travelers Express Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Ruthart v. First State Bank, Tulia, TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968