Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Delaware County v. Delaware County Prison Employees Independent Union

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1998No. 4 and 6 E.D. Appeal Docket 1997Published

1ConcurrenceCappy, Justice

While I concur in the result reached by the majority, I am compelled to write separately to emphasize my disagreement with the rationale utilized in reaching that result.

In summary, the majority, by substituting its own interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement for that of the arbitrator, has ignored the jurisprudence of this court by departing from our established and extremely limited standard of review, i.e. the “essence” test. Simply stated, the majority’s conclusion that the arbitrator’s award cannot in “any rational way” be derived from the collective bargaining agreement is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API