Legal Opinion

(PC) Casey v. Truillo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 21, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00560Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00560-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR 14 J. TRUILLO, et al., FAILURE TO EXHAUST Defendants. 15 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 James Arthur Casey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the 20 complaint commencing this action on April 14, 2020. (ECF No. 1). 21 It appears…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API