Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodney Andrews

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 7, 2006No. 06-1448PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Rodney E. Andrews is a serial bank robber and long-time drug addict. After Andrews was found competent to stand trial and agreed to a bench trial, the district court found him guilty of robbing a bank. Andrews, however, allegedly suffered from amnesia for the period of time surrounding the robbery. He claims that this rendered him incapable of assisting his attorney in preparing his defense and thus incompetent to stand trial. Because we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined Andrews’ request for a second competency exam and it did not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Robert Hilton Swanson and Jack Lavoied PhippsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Robert Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Price v. ThurmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Carol WoodardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API