Legal Opinion

J. Corning & Co. v. Wood

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of W. Baton Rouge, Avery, J.

1Opinion of the CourtVoorhies, J.

The plaintiffs, as holders of a bill of exchange, sue the drawer and the indorser. The defendants plead the prescription of five years.

The bill of exchange is on its face prescribed, unless prescription has been interrupted by the institution of a suit against the acceptors.

In the- case of Allain v. Longer, 4 La. 152, the court decided that a suit, brought against an endorser of a promissory note interrupted prescription as to the maker and other endorsers. But this decision was overruled by the case of Jacobs v. Williams, in which the question was elaborately considered by the court. 12 R.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. Morgan & LindseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Wooten v. WimberlySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Finance Security Co. v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Alfred Hiller Co. v. Hotel Grunewald Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. Grigsby v. Morgan & LindseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API