Application of Alamance Sav. & Loan Ass'n
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
While we agree with appellant that the entry of a final judgment on the merits is a somewhat questionable procedure, we note that the record reveals that the court had before it the briefs of the parties and the pertinent portions of the transcripts of the meetings of the Savings and Loan Commission and that the court had the benefit of the oral arguments of the attorneys for both parties on the merits. In light of the facts that judgment on the merits was entered on an issue solely of law and that the court below had before it all that was required for decision of this purely…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New Orleans v. PaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Stevenson v. North Carolina Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Davis v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Poythress v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation v. North Carolina Commission of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Estate of Presgrave v. StephensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ex Parte NixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.