Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Neff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1962No. 42,674PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a tort action from the order of the trial court sustaining defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and overruling plaintiff’s motion for new trial.

Plaintiff, a mechanic, was in need of an automatic transmission for a 1948 Buick and on February 10, 1956, he telephoned the Neff Auto Salvage Company in Wichita and talked with W. M. Briley, manager of the salvage yard, with respect to purchasing such a transmission. As a result of the conversation plaintiff drove to the yard to make the purchase and upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rule v. CheesemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Ziegelasch v. DurrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Crelly v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Weber v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Ogilvie v. MangelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Williams v. Community Drive-In Theater, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Christensen v. StuchlikIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Taylor v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Beggerly v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API